2016-05-30ft.com

Productivity is the ultimate test of our ability to create wealth. In the short term you can boost growth by working longer hours, for example, or importing more people. Or you could lift the retirement age. After a while these options lose steam... recent studies -- and common sense -- say our iPhones chain us to our employers even when we are at leisure. We may thus be exaggerating productivity growth by undercounting how much we work.

The latter certainly fits with the experience of most of the US labour force. It is no coincidence that since 2004 a majority of Americans began to tell pollsters they expected their children to be worse off -- the same year in which the internet-fuelled productivity leaps of the 1990s started to vanish. Most Americans have suffered from indifferent or declining wages in the past 15 years or so. A college graduate's starting salary today is in real terms well below where it was in 2000. For the first time the next generation of US workers will be less educated than the previous, according to the OECD, which means worse is probably yet to come. Last week's US productivity report bears that out.

... the US and most of the west are stuck with a deepening productivity crisis. The slowdown has one manifest effect and a seductive remedy. The first, an embittered backlash against business as usual, is already upon us. Witness Donald Trump's ascent...

Imagine the US takes much the same course in the next ten years as it has over the last. That would mean a further corrosion of US infrastructure, continued relative decline in the quality of public education, and atrophying middle workforce skills. It would also hasten the breakaway of urban America's most gilded enclaves, further enriching the educated elites. It could also, quite possibly, trigger a breakdown in democratic order. If you think Mr Trump's rise is ominous, picture America after another decade like the last.

Which brings me to the remedy: a universal basic income. UBI has several plus points. It draws support from all parts of the ideological spectrum: libertarian and socialist alike. It would replace today's messy overlap of benefits and do away with the humiliation of proving your eligibility to federal bureaucrats. Most important of all, however, it would buy a measure of social peace. Today's stagnation may be temporary or lasting. We have no way of telling. Common sense dictates we must act as though it is here to stay.

It is very interesting that the Brahmins of opinion keep hammering on "universal basic income" as the remedy for wage inequality and the misery of the 90-ish-percent. Why not basic housing and food vouchers (extending measures that are already in place) and eliminate the EIC and income tax filing entirely for people under a reasonable income level? Why, more importantly, not abolish the central banking and top-heavy monetary system that is driving the worsening inequality? Most likely because the Brahmins want to leave this system in place, yet combine it with "helicopter money". They haven't given up yet on trying to force inflation into the decrepit system to "save" it, allowing it to limp on a few more years while all the underlying structural economy malady remains...



Comments: Be the first to add a comment

add a comment | go to forum thread