2007-12-03hussman.net

Last week, investors made a great deal about an $8 billion 43-day repo that the Fed initiated. While this was reported as an extraordinary measure to stabilize the financial markets, the fact is that the Fed regularly enters a long-dated repo every year, just before the holidays, in order to accommodate a moderate increase in the demand for currency (in 1999, the amount was massive because of year-2000 fears, and was quickly reabsorbed after the new year). The $8 billion repo the Fed entered last week amounts to roughly $25 per American in extra cash to carry around the malls. To frame this as some sort of extraordinary effort to stabilize the banking system is absurd.

Again, the problem with the U.S. financial system here is not liquidity, but the solvency of mortgage loans and securitized debt. The Fed's actions are not likely to have material impact on this. To believe otherwise is mindless sheep-like superstition. Do investors really want to bet their financial security on the hope for “Fed liquidity” promised by uninformed analysts who don't understand monetary policy because they can't be bothered to look at the data?

Excellent work by Hussman. We would add that the real "expansion of liquidity" is not happening, but has already happened, in the form of the private credit markets. This has brought us to where we are today: a sudden removal of this "higher credit" liquidity -- which powered most of the US and global economy -- in a credit crunch. Of course, the Fed is not blameless here: it chose to allow the banking system and monetary system in general to operate without meaningful levels of reserves, having long ago eliminated them to bring about past banking system bailouts (as Hussman does mention).



Comments: Be the first to add a comment

add a comment | go to forum thread