|
||
2008-01-08 — cnbc.com
“They were not offered to prove that they had been sent,†Ms. Puida said. But she also said, under questioning from the court, that the letters did not carry a disclaimer indicating that they were not actual correspondence or that they had never been sent. A Countrywide spokesman said that in bankruptcy cases, Countrywide’s automated systems are sometimes overridden, with technicians making manual adjustments “to comply with bankruptcy laws and the requirements in the jurisdiction in which a bankruptcy is pending.†Asked by Judge Agresti why Countrywide would go to the trouble of “creating a letter that was never sent,†Ms. Puida, its lawyer, said she did not know. Fast and sleazy -- go-go Countrywide! source article | permalink | discuss | subscribe by: | RSS | email Comments: Be the first to add a comment add a comment | go to forum thread Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately. |