|
||
Relevant: |
2009-03-08 — washingtonpost.com
Once again, thousands of borrowers are getting loans they do not stand a chance of repaying. Only now, unlike in the subprime meltdown, Congress would have to bail out the lenders if the FHA cannot make good on guarantees from its existing reserves. And those once-robust reserves are showing signs of stress, raising the possibility that taxpayers may have to pick up the tab for the first time since the agency was established in 1934. The Washington Post (like everyone else who has covered this story so far) has not completed the thought: the worst contributor to this wave of FHA defaults is no doubt seller-funded downpayment assistance loans, which tend to start borrowers out with inflated appraisals and underwater. Though there are no teasers, when they are hit with a hardship, they have no hope of selling the house normally, as the negative equity is so bad (remember, these people could not afford the 3% downpayment in the first place). For those not following this story, seller-funded downpayments were made illegal in the Housing And Economic Recovery bill last year (effective October 1st), but the industry cronies that profit from this practice are trying to resurrect it with HR 600. This would, of course, be an unmitigated disaster. And this should really, really scare people:
(Notice how in the above they mention no-money-down FHA lending, but don't discuss the downpayment assistance programs that differ from "normal" FHA and how they, especially the seller-financed versions, are particularly dangerous.) source article | permalink | discuss | subscribe by: | RSS | email Comments: Be the first to add a comment add a comment | go to forum thread Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately. |