![]() ![]() |
||
2009-04-06 — businessinsider.com
The government's official view that toxic assets are incorrectly priced due to illiquidity "fire sales" is wrong, a new study by Harvard and Princeton finance professors suggests. You can read the whole paper by Harvard's Joshua Coval and Erik Stafford and Princeton's Jakub Jurek below. The striking conclusion is that the low prices of toxic assets actually reflect the fundamentals, rather than being driven by an illiquidity discount.
source article |
permalink |
discuss |
subscribe by:
Comments:
tvsterling at 20:01 2009-04-07 said:These giveaways are the ultimate moral hazard. It simply is not fair or just to expect the taxpayer to pay for somebody else who made a bad investment. Were these other people mentally incompetent? Might just as well delete, "and justice for all", from the pledge of allegiance. Permalinkadd a comment | go to forum thread Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately. |