Relevant:
- Should the government own any part of the "good" Fannie and Freddie?
- Lewis testified that U.S. urged silence on Merrill deal: report
- Dexia Bailout On Verge Of Collapse, Threatens To Take France AAA Rating Down With It
- BofA: $20B bailout, huge Merrill loss
- U.S. Treasury Needs Less Bailout Bluster: TARP Monitor
2009-09-01 — reuters.com
Charging a bank for an implicit government guarantee to absorb losses? According to the Wall Street Journal, the Federal Reserve and Treasury are demanding that Bank of America pay $500 million to exit a bailout deal that was never actually signed.
That’s a nice chunk of change, but taxpayers shouldn’t be fooled into thinking this — or any other bailout — is a good deal.
source article |
permalink |
discuss |
subscribe by:
|
RSS |
email 
Comments: Be the first to add a comment
add a comment | go to forum thread
Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately.
