|
||
2011-02-15 — ml-implode.com
Ah, but will anyone who holds the reins of power actually listen? Some of Raskin's wise words: A better business model–one that might attract more entrants and increase competition–would more closely tie expenses with compensation and reduce many of the principal-agent problems that currently exist. Rather than rolling most of the compensation into one annual fee that covers performing and delinquent loans alike, servicers could be compensated quite modestly for the routine processing of payments involved with performing assets. ... Another structural change that would help would be a limit on the extent to which servicers have to advance principal and interest on non-performing loans. In times of high delinquency, this can put considerable financial strain on servicers, which can lead to negative consequences for consumers trying to work with those stressed servicers. source article | permalink | discuss | subscribe by: | RSS | email Comments:
WTF Finance at 13:17 2011-02-16 said:I don't know how this could give anybody hope. Greenspan was once for a gold standard and again after he left the Fed he voiced concern of the inflationary policies. In 2007 he stated in an interview that he'd favor a gold standard or a currency board that would limit inflation. http://www.wtffinance.com/2011/01/federal-reserve-policy-to-remain-unchanged/ Fed history has shown that you either agree with the Fed or you no longer work for them. Of course those people always leave for personal reasons or for reasons that are non-related to the differences they have with the Fed's loose monetary policy. Just recently Kevin Warsh left the Fed. Things never change, sure they give the appearance that there is balance and certain members might voice concern about inflation at one point but it all ends once they are voting members. Permalinkadd a comment | go to forum thread Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately. |