2011-10-19technorati.com

``The study demonstrates clearly that Texas Congressman Ron Paul received the least coverage of any candidate by traditional news sources, despite his tremendous success in fundraising and straw polls, and his favorability in traditional polls. Contrast this with Dr. Paul's performance in the blogosphere, in which his coverage was the most favorable for any candidate -- 48 percent positive and only 15 percent negative. Outside of the "mainstream press," all of the other candidates received more negative than positive coverage. This thoroughly scientific study merely confirms what most of Dr. Paul's supporters have known for years.''



Comments: Be the first to add a comment

add a comment | go to forum thread