Relevant:
- Second Federal Appeals Court, Ruling Against Travel Ban 3.0, Just Said Trump's Tweets Show He's An Anti-Muslim Bigot
- Federal Reserve Seeks to Protect U.S. Bailout Secrets
- Judge Hints He May Rule Against Health Law
- Maurice Greenberg Loses Bid for Damages From A.I.G. Bailout
- Court upholds constitutionality of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
2012-06-30 — wealthcycles.com
``Asking the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality is akin to asking a sibling to "back you up." History has corroborated the fallacy of "judicial review." Between 1937 and 1995, not a single federal law was declared unconstitutional by the federal government's own court. The federal court does not act to protect liberty. Instead, it does the opposite: It expands the size and scope of government at the expense of liberty.''
source article |
permalink |
discuss |
subscribe by:
|
RSS |
email 
Comments: Be the first to add a comment
add a comment | go to forum thread
Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately.
