|
||
2012-09-05 — connecticutlawreview.org
``Although a seemingly large majority of jurisdictions agree with MERS's various arguments for its standing to foreclose and assign mortgages, courts in three states have recently shown that MERS remains vulnerable to attack. This Essay examines these recent anti-MERS decisions in the context of the ongoing debate about MERS's standing, while highlighting the novel approaches taken by the courts in question.''
source article | permalink | discuss | subscribe by: | RSS | email Comments: Be the first to add a comment add a comment | go to forum thread Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately. |