|
||
Relevant:
|
2013-03-19 — reuters.com
``In a decision made public on Monday, Patterson said that while the investors showed that JPMorgan had the ability to influence prices, a fact the bank did not dispute, they failed to show that the bank "intended to cause artificial prices to exist" and acted accordingly.'' -- Sorry, no "Fabulous Fab"-like emails bragging of swindling widows and orphans, so no case! The court basically killed this suit by not allowing it to get to discovery.
source article | permalink | discuss | subscribe by: | RSS | email Comments: Be the first to add a comment add a comment | go to forum thread Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately. |