2013-03-19reuters.com

``In a decision made public on Monday, Patterson said that while the investors showed that JPMorgan had the ability to influence prices, a fact the bank did not dispute, they failed to show that the bank "intended to cause artificial prices to exist" and acted accordingly.'' -- Sorry, no "Fabulous Fab"-like emails bragging of swindling widows and orphans, so no case! The court basically killed this suit by not allowing it to get to discovery.



Comments: Be the first to add a comment

add a comment | go to forum thread