Relevant:
- Backing Banks Over Borrowers, California Judges Often Big Stakeholders in Same Banks
- Bad Press on Bank Foreclosures Making Some Judges More Cautious
- Fla. court OKs using non-judges on foreclosures
- MFI-Miami: Michigan Court Revealed For "Not Reading" or Ignoring Broken Chain of Title Arguments
- Banks Face New Rules on Foreclosures from Skeptical State Judges
2013-09-28 — nytimes.com
``This case is undoubtedly big, but it is only one of many mortgage-related matters inching through the judicial system. And what is notable about some of the lower-profile matters is the tone and tack that federal judges are taking in their rulings. District court judges are not generally known as flamethrowers, but some seem to be losing patience with the banks.
For decades leading up to the foreclosure debacle, plaintiffs' lawyers say, judges generally took the side of lenders when borrowers came to court complaining of problematic lending or predatory loan servicing. Many judges still do. But some are getting tough, perhaps having seen too many examples of dubious bank behavior. ''
source article |
permalink |
discuss |
subscribe by:
|
RSS |
email 
Comments: Be the first to add a comment
add a comment | go to forum thread
Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately.
