2009-01-07larouchepub.com

On Feb. 4, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), which has oversight over the two giant housing-finance enterprises known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, released a report entitled, "Systemic Risk: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Role of OFHEO." Its report examined the potential for the generation of a systemic crisis at Fannie and/or Freddie.

...

After pro forma formulations that Fannie and Freddie are "fundamentally sound," and that the possibility of a serious crisis "is remote," OFHEO made a stunning statement about a worst-case scenario in which either Fannie or Freddie had a severe crisis which caused it to default on its debt. Such a default, it said, "could lead to contagious illiquidity in the market for those [debt] securities, [and] cause or worsen liquidity problems at other financial institutions ... potentially leading to a systemic event." This systemic event would deliver a shock to the entire financial system, and a "substantial loss in economic activity."

...

Further, the OFHEO report discusses the risks to the financial system posed by derivatives—not simply the derivatives held by Fannie and Freddie, but the unregulated mountain of derivatives contracts in general.

...

On Feb. 5, a mere 24 hours after the report's issuance, the Bush Administration demanded that OFHEO Director Armando Falcon submit his resignation. Falcon, who been appointed to this post in 1999 by President Bill Clinton, had overseen the report's release. While the Bush Administration delivered the order for Falcon to resign, both the circumstances of the firing and subsequent events make it clear that the actual order for the firing originated from inside the boardroom of J.P. Morgan Chase—the world's largest derivatives bank with $29 trillion in derivatives outstanding—and the boardrooms of other major institutions that are heavily invested in derivatives and housing market paper.

What is sad here is that, although Falcon reported that the disaster scenario was "remote" (based on hand-waving "pro forma" estimates of Fannie and Freddie's solvency), he was punished merely for mentiong the possiblity of the disaster scenario that has now unfolded.

In essence, this was "thought crime" punishment (something the Bush administration made a high priority, as it regularly purged its own ranks, civilian and military over the past eight years). Of course, if you talked about it, you'd get purged. It was a devastatingly effective means of control, and the results we all have to deal with (a housing and derivatives bubble that got out of control) are equally devastating.

And of course, the possibility that heavy influence to such self-interested "purging" might come from a Wall Street bank like JP Morgan is an even more disturbing twist to the story.



Comments:

Penguin87 at 23:05 2009-01-07 said:
Sorry, I cannot believe that Lyndon Larouche, of all people, was so prescient that he predicted every tiny detail of the current calamity a full 5 years before it happened. If such were the case we surely would have heard about it by November 2008 because he would have been crowing from the roooftops telling people how smart he is. IMO this article is entirely fictitious and it was written yesterday and backdated. Anybody who believes Larouche's claims is nuts. You heard it here first. Permalink
Tobby at 01:30 2009-01-08 said:
LOL. I thought he was still in jail. Really, do you want to be quoting something from Larouche? First WorldNetDaily and now this. What's next, Elvis sightings? Permalink
punstress at 01:39 2009-01-08 said:
I clicked on the PDF of that "journal," which I'm sure can be looked up somewhere like Lexis Nexis?, and looked at the document properties. Created 3/7/03, modified 12/16/06. Permalink

add a comment | go to forum thread