Ratigan: "We Spent Four Times More On Clinton's Blowjob Than We Did Investigating The Financial Crisis"

catherine at 11:46 2011-02-25 said:

I think you must mean WHEN THE PRESIDENT LIED UNDER OATH' that is what the money was spent on.........

and when 85% of Wall Street money went to the people in power (democrats) in 07 - well they got what they paid for, didn't they? Permalink

buyerbeware at 21:02 2011-02-25 said:

I think you must mean WHEN THE PRESIDENT LIED UNDER OATH' that is what the money was spent on.........

and when 85% of Wall Street money went to the people in power (democrats) in 07 - well they got what they paid for, didn't they?

52% of Wall Street donations went to Democrats in the 2006 election cycle, not 85%......

But, oddly, that wasn't the point of the article. The point was GOPenis envy. Permalink

catherine at 21:41 2011-02-25 said:

I think you must mean WHEN THE PRESIDENT LIED UNDER OATH' that is what the money was spent on.........

and when 85% of Wall Street money went to the people in power (democrats) in 07 - well they got what they paid for, didn't they?

52% of Wall Street donations went to Democrats in the 2006 election cycle, not 85%......

But, oddly, that wasn't the point of the article. The point was GOPenis envy.

yeah we get it you are the bigger 'di--ks) :lol: :lol:

okay you win

and bragging about a president using a little jewish intern as an ashtray seems low even for you....

and 52% yeppim, :roll: :roll:

I have friends that bundled for these people, why DO YOU THINK NO ONE IS IN JAIL??? WHY ARE THE BONUSES STILL GOING TO THE BIG BOYS IN OUR FACES..............didn't this administration run for office against that :lol: :lol: :lol:

we are watching what THEY REALLY DO FOR THEIR BOYS..........

NO PENALTIES AT ALL..............AND THEY OWNED EVERYTHING FOR TWO YEARS.................

but you little boys need to realize how money is funneled into politics, just like gubment numbers, they lie

The organizations themselves did not donate more than allowed , rather the money came from the organization's PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.

Because of contribution limits, organizations that bundle together many individual contributions are often among the top donors to presidential candidates. These contributions can come from the organization's members or employees (and their families).

and remember barry had about 500 million THAT WE WILL NEVER KNOW WHERE IT CAME FROM..........but hey good bash and expected you......... Permalink

buyerbeware at 07:14 2011-02-26 said:

catherine says:

yeah we get it you are the bigger 'di--ks) :lol: :lol:

It's not like YOU would know :lol: :lol:

catherine says:

and bragging about a president using a little jewish intern as an ashtray seems low even for you....

Who's bragging about anything? It is what it is. The GOP were obsessed with Clinton's weeener. I mean, c'mon, they spent 41 million dollars trying to throw it out of the White House. The irony of the GOP using Clinton's pickle to screw the entire country out of $41 million, it's friggin' hilarious if it wasn't so pathetic.

(and it's nice to see that you've developed a sympathy for the Jewish people; nice about-face).

catherine says:

and 52% yeppim, :roll: :roll:

but you little boys need to realize how money is funneled into politics, just like gubment numbers, they lie

Yeah, 52%

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/10/6/120142.shtml

"Democrats have received $23.8 million from Wall Street compared to $21.7 million for Republicans. Over the previous five election cycles, Republicans captured 52 to 58 percent of the industry's political donations.

About 80 percent of the contributions from the industry comes from employees. The rest comes from political action committees, which remain loyal to Republicans for lowering tax rates on dividends and capital gains, for example."

So, if you are correct about 85% of Wall Street money going to Democrats, then ALL of the individual contributions PLUS an additional 2.275 million from the PACS' stash went to Democrats. Does anyone think that's true? It doesn't seem possible, but if you say so.....:roll: :roll:

catherine says:

but hey good bash and expected you.........

You seem more sensitive than the tone of your posts. I suppose calling me a big "di--k" for disagreeing with you was flattery?

If so, thank you

If not, thank you Permalink

catherine at 12:47 2011-02-26 said:

you brought up the GOP pricks first

AND MAYBE IF THAT IMPEACHED STAIN HAD TOLD THE TRUTH and not made the nation SIT in his sewer as he LIED AND PRETENDED MONICA WAS 'another lying woman' FOR OVER A DAMN YEAR.............

it wouldn't have cost so much...................the supreme court said that he assaulted jones and he said he didn't do anything (LYING PIG)

AND SHE DESCRIBED HIS WEENIE WITH IT'S PERONIES DISEASE TO THE 'T'............THAT WOULD BE LYING UNDER OATH AND PEOPLE LIE IN DIVORCES AND GO TO JAIL FOR 5 YEARS FOR THAT

but the stain should be excused?????

and that :lol: :lol: :lol: the ASSAULTING PIG WAS AT THE SAME TIME USING A LITTLE JEWISH INTERN AS AN ASHTRAY...........was just sweet as can be and if she hadn't saved the dress THEN SHE WOULD BE JUST ANOTHER LYING HO he trashed............

you boys put this garbage in office and then carry 'kill bush' signs......... :roll: :roll: .........

AGAIN IF YOUR PIG HAD TOLD THE TRUTH, maybe he wouldn't have cost the nation that much money.................and you liberals blame everyone but the PIG

IT IS THAT PIG'S FAULT and no one else..........

and he lost his law license for awhile in a couple states so it wasn't just about sex

AND HE DID THE GUTTING OF GLASS STEAGALL, believe me HE WANTS THE WORLD TO THINK HE IS A RAPIST OVER THE GUY THAT STARTED THE DEPRESSION...............

but that is how that impeached stain will go down in history,

you boys can't revision that pig............and I am so disappointed in someone like you trying BB Permalink

achtung at 06:46 2011-02-27 said:

Yes, of course we know Clinton is not the standard DC philanderer, HE GOT CAUGHT.

Imagine ... all of this from a real estate transaction in Whitewater, turns out to be about a blow job from an intern.

However, as you point out. If the Republican Congress repealed Glass Steagal, THEN the REPUBLICANS own it.

Isn't that the standard you are living by, Catherine?

You sure drag it out when complaining about the debt level we have, and how it was Pelosi's democrat party, NOT BUSH, that made the debt while Bush was President. Phil Graham and Jim Leach sponsored the Republican led Bill and passed it in the Republican Senate -- So it is a Republican cause.

Somehow that does not apply ??? Permalink