2012-11-13 — rctlj.org
``In its discussion, the court maintained that MERS lacked the authority to assign the consolidation agreement to the bank because it never possessed the promissory note--that is, it never had a security interest in the mortgage.[9] As such, the bank did not have standing to commence a foreclosure action against the Silverberg's.''
source article |
permalink |
discuss |
subscribe by:
|
RSS |
email 
Comments: Be the first to add a comment
add a comment | go to forum thread
Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately.
